Dissertation: Detrixhe 2011

Detrixhe, Jonathan (1/11) Solitude’s paradox: the role of object relations and attachment in the capacity to be alone (Lisa Samstag, Ph.D.; Linda Penn, Ph.D.; Philip Wong, Ph.D.)

The present study hypothesized that the quality of one's object relations and attachment help determine attitude toward solitude and wellbeing, and further, that attitude toward solitude helps transmit the positive effects of attachment and object relations to wellbeing. A "bootstrapping" model of mediation analysis (Preacher & Hayes, 2008) was employed to test these hypotheses, resulting in three significant mediation effects and one significant suppression effect. The tendency to use solitude to relax ( Capacity to Be Alone Scale; CBAS Solitary Comfort; Larson & Lee, 1996) mediated the positive relationship between attachment-related anxiety (Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire - Revised ; ECR-R Anxiety; Fraley, Waller, and Brennan, 2000a) and loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale, Version 3 ; UCLA-LS; Russell, 1996). Unsociability, or the tendency to choose solitary over social experiences (Sociability Scale ; SS Reverse Scored; Cheek & Buss, 1981), mediated the positive relationship between attachment-related avoidance (ECR-R Avoidance) and loneliness (UCLA-LS). Unsociability (SS Reverse Scored) also mediated the positive relationship between the degree of differentiation and relatedness in participant descriptions of mother, father, self, and significant other ( Object Relations Inventory Differentiation-Relatedness Scale ; ORI D-R; Diamond, Blatt, Stayner, & Kaslow, 1991) and loneliness (UCLA-LS). Finally, the tendency to use solitude to relax (CBAS Solitary Comfort) suppressed the positive relationship between the degree of differentiation and relatedness in descriptions of others (ORI D-R) and loneliness (UCLA-LS). No significant direct effect was found between the degree of maturity in descriptions of others ( Object Relations Inventory Conceptual Level Scale ; ORI CL; Blatt, Wein, Chevron, & Quinlan, 1979) and the UCLA-LS, and no meditation effects were shown for the models with ORI CL as the independent variable. Though not all the hypotheses were supported, these findings suggest that there is a process by which, in a non-clinical sample, one's quality of attachment and object relations influence self-reported loneliness through one's attitude toward solitude. This further suggests that attitude toward solitude is not a distinct personality construct, separate from quality of attachment and object relatedness. On the contrary, it appears that solitude, object relations, and attachment theories may be able to inform and expand each other.